Who Will Be Snubbed At Next Year’s Oscars?

We are knee-deep in Awards Season, and with this morning’s announcement of the Golden Globe nominations, it seems clear that we have a predictable Oscars race on our hands. Blah blah blah Lincoln Argo Zero Dark Thirty Silver Linings Playbook, blah blah blah Anne Hathaway Joaquin Phoenix Jessica Chastain Daniel Day-Lewis. Every year there are a handful of folks who seem to go unnoticed in the wake of the heavy-hitters and the PR campaigns behind those bigger, obvious Oscar-baiting movies. Here’s a list of actors who are worth a second look. 

Dwight Henry, Beasts of the Southern Wild

An audience favorite over the summer, the film has probably suffered in the awards race because it was released so early in the year. (If it’s on DVD by Christmas, odds are the academy will ignore it.) Sure, "independent movies" seem to do well at the Oscars, but… HA HA HA, just kidding. What, did you think it’s the ’90s all of a sudden? This scrappy little favorite is full of surprising turns from unprofessional, untrained actors, and, let’s face it, they’ve handed out enough awards to people of color in the last few years, so you should expect the five nominees for Best Actor to be from movies like Argo, The Master, Lincoln, et cetera. It’s a shame, however, because Henry’s performance broke my heart. Let’s just hope he continues with this late-in-life acting career and shows up in a few more movies.

Kirsten Dunst, Bachelorette

Let’s face it: Kirsten Dunst should have been nominated last year for her brilliant and dark role in Lars Von Trier’s Melancholia. Luckily, that setback didn’t stop her. As Regan, a viciously mean maid of honor, Dunst made a welcome return to the world of comedy. What Bachelorette offered, compared to other female-driven comedy, was an underlying meanness and bite and is woefully lacking (see, for example, Bridesmaids, which received accolades for its gross-out humor rather than its believability). Writer-director Leslye Headland examined more about wedding culture and modern womanhood in an hour and a half than most people (both men and women) can fit into two hours. Holding it all together, though, was Dunst’s pitch-perfect combination of toughness and vulnerability, a combination not usually seen so openly on film. 

Ezra Miller, The Perks of Being a Wallflower

Films made for and about teenagers are rarely any good. Even those John Hughes movies from the ’80s were more goofy than serious (with the exception, possibly, of The Breakfast Club). I was dubious about The Perks of Being a Wallflower, but was really blown away with writer-director Stephen Chbosky’s ability to translate his novel. The film treats its characters like adults rather than patronizing them. Miller’s Patrick could have easily filled the Manic Dream Pixie Gay role—existing solely to bring the main character “out of his shell” by way of flamboyance and zingers. Instead, Perks allows its audience to see Patrick as a three-dimensional character by bringing out his own frustrations and needs. Miller delivers an astounding performance so early in his career that deserves to be recognized at next spring’s ceremony.

Ann Dowd, Compliance

It’s no surprise that middle-aged actresses are pigeonholed into supporting roles that lack any real substance. It’s even worse for character actors who don’t fit into the mainstream ideal of a leading lady. Compliance’s Ann Dowd, who has a long career of smaller roles in big movies (see if you can spot her in films like Philadelphia and Garden State), finally received great notice for Craig Zobel’s meditation on human behavior, earning a Best Supporting Actress award from the National Board of Review and a nod at the Independent Spirit Awards. Will she squeeze it alongside names like Helen Hunt and Anne Hathaway at the Oscars? It’s possible, but it seems unlikely. 

Follow Tyler Coates on Twitter

Stephen Chbosky Brings His Iconic ‘The Perks of Being a Wallflower’ to the Big Screen

In 1999, Stephen Chbosky published his first and only novel, The Perks of Being a Wallflower. In a little more than a decade, the book has become a modern classic among teenagers and adults alike. The epistolary novel follows Charlie, a sullen, naïve high school freshman, as he navigates the emotionally tricky waters of adolescence. But Charlie doesn’t suffer from Holden Caulfield angst, even if Perks is frequently compared to the Salinger classic.

Rather, Charlie falls in with the beautiful and enigmatic Sam, a senior on whom Charlie immediately forms a crush, and her gay stepbrother, Patrick. The duo then introduces Charlie to The Smiths, The Rocky Horror Picture Show, and a motley crew of supposed burnouts and punks, giving him his first real understanding of friendship and compassion based on cultural appreciation rather than convenient proximity.

Thirteen years later, Perks hits the big screen, and who better to take the helm than Chbosky himself? “I always knew I wanted to do a movie and make the movie myself,” he explains. “I needed enough distance from it so that I could see the book much more objectively. I’d be very unhappy if it wasn’t as good as the book.” Luckily, it is, and is perhaps even better. Set in the early ’90s (though never explicitly so), the film has an agelessness to it that harkens back to the ’80s films of John Hughes, a writer-director most moviegoers born after 1970 automatically associate with cinematic adolescence.

And like the best John Hughes films, Perks treats its characters appropriately. They are not annoyingly wise beyond their years, nor are they looked down upon. “I set out to respect what young people go through right at eye level,” Chbosky says. The subtle period setting was also deliberate. “I wanted the movie to feel as absolutely timeless as possible. One of my favorite movies is Dead Poets Society. It takes place in 1959, but it could have taken place last year.”

What is most surprising, however, is the treatment of Sam and Patrick, who under the control of any other auteur could have turned into stock Manic Pixie Dream Girl / Manic Pixie Dream Gay characters whose only role in the film is to guide young Charlie (played by Logan Lerman) into emotional maturity via their own quirks and precociousness. With Emma Watson and Ezra Miller in those roles, however, Sam and Patrick offer up more than the pretty looks of the actors portraying them. Watson’s Sam is glorious and tragic, already full of regret at eighteen and striving to overcome the mistakes of her very recent past. In Patrick, Miller delivers a surprising confidence and a recognizable vulnerability, a combination not seen in most gay male characters, much less those still in high school.

As for Chbosky’s agenda? Contrary to what most conservative parents and teachers will have you believe, it’s not to portray teenagers as drug-using, beer-slinging sex maniacs. In response to the novel’s frequent banning from school curriculums and libraries—and the film’s PG-13 rating—Chbosky says, “It was always marketed as an adult book. It still is. I think that anyone that sees the film would be hard-pressed to think it’s some exploitative, cynical Trojan horse trying to encourage drug use or a homosexual lifestyle or anything that certain groups would object to.” Instead, Chbosky hopes Perks will bring together audiences of all generations and facilitate a dialogue between them after the credits roll. “I hope kids will see it and feel respected,” he says. “In the same breath, I hope their parents will feel nostalgic and feel respectful of what they’ve been through.” Chbosky pauses, and with a glimmer of optimism, says, “Maybe then they’ll talk to each other a bit more.”

Contact the author of this post at tyler@bbook.com, and follow him on Twitter

Relive Your Teen Angst With ‘The Perks of Being A Wallflower’ Trailer

Did you hear that sound, readers? That sound was Tumblr exploding, thanks to the trailer that launched a thousand “squeeeeeeeeeee!”s. The film adaptation of The Perks of Being A Wallflower, Stephen Chbosky’s modern young adult classic that is either the Catcher In The Rye of the digital generation or a string of annoyingly-overquoted high school poetic Facebook profile soundbites, depending on who you ask, has been the subject of buzz for a while. And now there’s a trailer, which premiered, aptly, during the MTV Movie Awards.

The trailer exhibits some key scenes fans of the novel will recognize, and pretty faithfully at that, which makes sense, since Chbosky wrote the screenplay and serves as director (fun fact: he also wrote the film adaptation of Rent, which, much like Wallflower, is another work a lot of people tend to really, really love in their formative years—and a few quite a bit later). But sadly, none of the music referenced heavily in it appears—nothing from The Smiths, no “Landslide.”

Mr. Mudd, the studio that brought you Juno and Ghost World, is behind the adaptation, which stars Logan Lerman (Percy Jackson & The Olympians) as Charlie, the earnest young narrator. The great and terrifying Ezra Miller, who starred as the disturbed-teen title character in We Need to Talk About Kevin, plays Charlie’s best pal, Patrick, and Emma Watson trades in her Gryffindor robes for Rocky Horror fishnets as his other best friend/love interest, Sam. Paul Rudd (as Charlie’s English teacher), Nina Dobrev, Kate Walsh and Dylan McDermott round out the cast. The trailer shows several pivotal scenes, including a schoolyard brawl, the Christmas party, one of the many Rocky Horror Picture Show reenactments and that iconic moment, in the tunnel, when Sam/Emma stands up on the truck flatbed with her dress billowing in the wind and everyone has a lot of feelings. We also get two of the book’s key profile-quote soundbites: “We accept the love we think we deserve” and “In that moment, I swear we were infinite.” Commence GIF-creating in 5… 4… 3… 2…

Watch the trailer below, and then listen to one of the theme songs appearing throughout the novel—“Asleep” by The Smiths.